Quantem
A junior developer built an MCP layer in one day from acceptance criteria on the board, and it passed end-to-end testing. Four to five days of context work, one day of building.
Stories with acceptance criteria on a board your team runs, exposed to Claude Code, Codex and Cursor as MCP tools. The agent picks up the card, builds to the criteria, and the card remembers why it exists.
Most teams wiring Claude Code to Jira or Linear over MCP get a ticket title and a description into the agent and stop there. The agent builds what the ticket says, and the ticket said very little. Feature1's board is different in one way: every card is a story planned from a feature, from an initiative, from the strategy, with acceptance criteria written before the card was created. That is what the agent reads.
The POC: your PM, your developer, read-only GitHub access, two cards shipped from acceptance criteria in one to two weeks.
Feature1 exposes thirty-plus MCP tools for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any MCP client. The agent loads the story and its criteria, builds the next criterion, and the developer owns the pull request. The board updates when the code merges.
The card is a user story planned from a feature, which came from an initiative on the roadmap. It has acceptance criteria before it has an assignee.
Claude Code calls get_feature and get_next_ac over MCP and reads the story, its criteria and the capability context.
The agent builds scoped to one acceptance criterion at a time. Fewer product questions, fewer side effects.
Your developer reviews the pull request against the written criteria and moves the card.
On merge, Feature1 rescans the repository and the capability behind the card changes.
Adoption and error signals attach to the feature after release, so the next card starts from evidence.
A junior developer built an MCP layer in one day from acceptance criteria on the board, and it passed end-to-end testing. Four to five days of context work, one day of building.
Delivery sped up and the constraint moved to deciding what goes on the board. They hired a second product manager, not a third developer.
A Replit store with one unintegrated server file became a real product once its capabilities were written down and the next cards were specified against them.
A fixed-scope proof of concept with your own PM and developer. Your board, your agent, two stories built to written criteria over MCP, in one to two weeks.
Abdulrahman, founder of Feature1, runs the POC with your team. He does not write the code. Your developer does, with the agent, which is the point: the process has to work with the people you have.
Through Feature1's MCP endpoint. Add it to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor as an MCP server and the agent gets tools such as get_feature and get_next_ac that return the story, its acceptance criteria and the capability context.
Yes, for anything outside product work. The stories the agent builds from live on the Feature1 board, because that is where the acceptance criteria and the links to the feature and the strategy are. Compare in detail in Feature1 vs Jira and Feature1 vs Linear on the blog.
Acceptance criteria written before the card was created, the feature and initiative it serves, the capability it changes, and what the product can already do there. The agent reads all of it; a ticket gives it a title and a description.
The agent builds. Your developer reviews the pull request against the criteria and moves the card. When the code merges, Feature1 rescans the repository and updates the capability picture behind the card.
One to two weeks with your PM and one developer: a product strategy narrative, a roadmap built on what the product already does, and two stories shipped from acceptance criteria on the board by your developer and their agent. NDA first, read-only GitHub access.
Yes. Sign up, no credit card, write the first narrative and plan the first feature yourself. Then connect Claude Code to the MCP endpoint.
Two cards, your team, one to two weeks. Or sign up and plan the first feature yourself, free.